Leveraged 2X Funds Slide After Trump Deal Rally
Rare-earth ETFs flipped sharply lower on Tuesday, underscoring how quickly policy-driven trades can unwind, especially when leverage is involved. After explosive gains last week, both single-stock and diversified rare-earth ETFs retreated alongside a steep drop in shares of USA Rare Earth Inc. (NASDAQ:USAR), highlighting the risks of trading geopolitics through high-octane ETF products.
The sharpest moves once again came from leveraged ETFs tied to USAR. After jumping nearly 65% last week, the Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (NASDAQ:USGG) and the Tradr 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (BATS:USAX) were both deeply in the red on Tuesday with around 30% declines, mirroring a roughly 15% decline in USAR shares.
Don’t Miss:
These ETFs are designed to deliver twice the daily return of the underlying stock, a structure that magnifies losses just as aggressively as gains. As momentum faded following last week’s rally, the downside move accelerated, reinforcing their role as short-term trading tools rather than long-term exposure vehicles.
Last week’s surge in USAR was fueled by a major federal commitment to USA Rare Earth. The U.S. government announced its plans for a $277 million in direct funding and a $1.3 billion loan, while the Department of Commerce will receive 16 million shares in the company. The deal, closed on Jan. 29, is aimed at strengthening domestic supply chains and reducing reliance on China, the world’s dominant producer of rare earths.
Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the investment would help ensure U.S. mineral independence, framing rare earths as a national security priority. USA Rare Earth, which operates a manufacturing facility in Stillwater, plans to begin mining operations in West Texas by 2028, targeting production of up to 40,000 tons of rare-earth materials per day.
Trending: This Real Estate Fund Pays 10x More Than the Average Savings Account – Invest From Just $100
Still, the selloff suggests investors are reassessing near-term expectations. The company continues to face operating losses and negative cash flow, and production remains at least a couple of years away. These factors may have resurfaced as the initial policy-driven enthusiasm cooled.